Blue Yeti Nano vs HyperX QuadCast 

Podcast has been a popular method to share content and ideas that can be enjoyed in a more convenient way compared to video for we can listen to audio while doing other activities. For those who want to start their podcast channel, make sure to have a reliable microphone like Blue Yeti Nano Vs HyperX QuadCast that will give you a good audio quality. Before you pick any of them, go check which microphone will suit your application below.

In this article, we are going to give you information about:

  • Which Microphone to Choose for Podcasting Purpose
  • What are Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast 
  • What Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast Look Like
  • How are the Sound Quality of Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast
  • What Patterns Available in Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast
  • Blue Yeti Nano Vs HyperX QuadCast

Microphone for Podcaster

Starting a podcast channel sounds simple and can be done in a matter of hours but in reality, you will have to choose the tools from a huge range of options that not only confusing especially for a first time shoppers but also will take quite the time and budget in case you aim for the best, high-end products. Compared to a video bloggers, our gear is actually not that much or expensive because a good microphone can come a long way.

As you may already know, there are few types of microphone based on the mechanism and it is always between dynamic and condenser models such as MXL 440 Vs AT2020 that causes so much confusion. There is actually no one better than the other because output level and frequency response are the factors that decide your application. Condenser is well-known for its sensitive character so it produce higher output level thus, we don’t need much amplification by mixer that may cause hiss especially in cheaper mixer.

Condenser microphone also has better response to high frequencies compared to dynamic microphones and this will give you crisp, detailed sound so podcasters may experience picking up too much sound from its room. Dynamic microphones on the other hand naturally mask these irritants just like those filters on cameras that will help you conceal some blemishes.

In addition, there is more to a good microphone for podcasting; for example the pattern and why cardioid is often chosen as the pattern we prefer better in such application is because they naturally less sensitive to sound from the side and back which means, they also reduce pick up from the room as well as its reflection. If you are worried about picking up the slightest noise in your room, there is a more effective super cardioid or shotgun microphone to try.

Some users prefer to use their microphone as it is and probably edit the sound before being streamed but for those who are streaming live and prefer to send the audio as it is with very little editing, adding a pop filter will always be a more convenient option. In some models pop filter is included on the microphone package or you can purchase them separately. Additionally there is a shock mount to prevent the low-frequency vibration such as those slight vibration form you accidentally touching the table.

 Blue Yeti NanoHyperX QuadCast 
Shop now at Amazonclick hereclick here
Product Dimensions4.3 x 3.8 x 8.4 inches
5 x 4 x 9.8 inches
Shipping Weight2.12 pounds
1.57 pounds

About Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast

If you have decided to shop for the most ideal microphone for your podcast application, now is the time to see what the market has to offer because there are so many options out there. In general they will be able to capture your voice and actually pretty good for general purposes but for those who pay attention to sound quality, not all will perform the same or give the exact same level of versatility. In addition, you may want to decide the budget range first so we can shop quickly.

You can find good podcasting microphone both dynamic and condenser type from various different brands but among those many options, Blue and HyperX will be two of the most versatile and ideal choice to shop from. We are sure most users are already familiar with these two companies because they are very much well-known in the game. What makes them different is that the former is more popular for podcasting while the latter is for gaming peripheral that now also offer a podcasting microphone.

Blue is one of the leaders when it comes to podcasting microphone and there are so many users have been using their products for different applications which is mostly gave positive feedback. They continue to offer a variant of the most loved Yeti microphone we have been talking in various articles back then and now, it comes to one of their new addition, the Yeti Nano which is still the same, offering a convenient USB connectivity for your computer-centered application.

As for the HyperX, this one is actually a gaming peripheral manufacturer and very popular with its wide range of options especially with the rising gaming hobby and people who are streaming their game. If you are also looking for a podcasting microphone application, they have the QuadCast model that will also offer one of the best performance in the market. Both of these microphones are different when it comes to the main market what they have been aiming for yet, they are also versatile.

In terms of sound quality, for starters they are amazing for the price range and the reason why many people have been using them is because we don’t need anything in between the microphone and computer for both are USB model and very much useful without any adjustment. 

Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast Design

Side by side Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast are looking like any USB microphones out there with the distinct simple design but they are not looking like each other as well. The Yeti Nano comes with the same, simple look of its popular original Yeti microphone but now it is smaller and looks rather petite yet the body and overall construction is still as robust as ever. It has the mic stand and measured at 8.3 by 3.8 by 4.3 inches while weighing at 1.4 pounds.

QuadCast on the other hand, is looking almost like any gaming peripherals out there with a bold and fancy looking grill. Unlike most podcast microphones that appears rather boring and professionals, this one has a red filter inside the grill combined with a pure black stand, making the whole unit looks quite captivating. This red, vibrant filter is darker when in the off position but when you are recording or live, there is an illumination that makes the unit even more appealing especially if you have a gaming setup with colorful lighting setting.

Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast Sound Quality

The first thing you may want to check out about a microphone is their sound quality and in this side, both Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast are very reliable, both of them are going to give you clear sound especially when added with pop filter if you are worried about the room noise. What’s impressive is you don’t have to put so much effort adjusting the sound from your audio software because they sound good right off the bat. 

They have low latency and actually still acceptable without any additional filter yet, just like many microphones, you will notice how they will capture the “p” sound every time we talked and this can be a little bit annoying at times. We do recommend users to get an additional pop up filter to handle this issue, just a little investment for a much better sound quality. On paper, both of them are able to capture sample rate of 48kHz but Yeti has bit depth of 24 compared to 16.

In real life experience however, there will be no difference in our listening session between the 16-bit and 24-bot of vocal but yes, on paper, the QuadCast is falling behind Yeti Nano and other popular microphones like G-Track Pro while the frequency response stays the same of 20Hz to 20kHz which is generally the most widely used range in this specific market.

Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast Patterns

Moving further, Blue Yeti Nano and HyperX QuadCast are also coming with few different patterns to let you adjust and choose which one will give the best performance especially for certain situations. Starting with the first microphone, this model offers only two patterns; cardioid and omnidirectional. The cardioid is more ideal for podcasting purposes while the omnidirectional option will capture sound from a wider range or all sides of the microphone. The QuadCast offer two more patterns into its option; stereo and bidirectional.

As you may already know, the bidirectional polar pattern is mostly used in a setting where there are two people speaking into the microphone such as when doing an interview since it picks up sound from both front and back of the unit. Stereo on the other hand is accepting sound from left and side, very similar to bidirectional when it comes to purpose but instead of sitting face to face, the people speaking are sitting side by side.

Blue Yeti Nano vs HyperX QuadCast 

- Perfect for podcasting, game streaming, Skype calls, YouTube or music
- No-latency headphone output, headphone volume and mic mute
- Standard threading for radius III shock mount and/or compass boom arm
- Plug ‘N play-mac and PC compatible
- Anti vibration shock mount
- Tap to mute sensor with LED indicator
- Four selectable polar patterns
- Mount adapter included

Both of them are a good option for a podcasters because they sound great and already amazing with little to no further adjustment from your software. You will need pop up filter with any of them to improve the sound quality but in comparison QuadCast has 4 different pick up patterns yet it has lower bit depth. Additionally QuadCast is also packed with shock mount so we don’t have to purchase one anymore.


All in all you can pick just any of these amazing microphone but for those who are into gaming setup the HyperX QuadCast is a more stylish option and is also better if you plan to record with two people since it has both bidirectional and stereo pattern.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *