Zoom H4N vs Tacam DR-40

Handheld advanced sound recorders pass by various names: handheld field recorder, handheld recorder, compact digital sound recorder, and most likely others. Regardless of what you call them, these things are magnificent. They have worked in receivers, yet additionally incorporate different data sources and yields for various sources including mouthpieces, instruments, earphones, and that is just the beginning. 

On the off chance that you need a convenient digital recorder that highlights XLR sources of info but you do not have heaps of money to spend, there are two alternatives that stick out: Zoom H4n and TASCAM DR-40. See also: Zoom H6 vs H4N.

We made this article to help you comprehend the differences between the two and to impart some insight concerning which one makes a better purchase. 

At the start, TASCAM DR-04 has the upside of being around 100 USD more affordable which is an extensive aggregate. One can just accept that most individuals would see the lower cost of it and their choice would be made on cost alone.

Be that as it may, on the off chance that you are considering how these two models vary in structure, capacity, and ease of use, it would be ideal if you keep on reading.  

Overview: Zoom H4n vs TASCAM DR-04 

From a sheer vanity viewpoint, the Zoom H4n looks somewhat greater in your grasp. There are progressively lit up buttons all over and it simply has an increasingly clean appearance.

From a progressively common-sense stance, the outside is covered with a somewhat rubber-like substance that will not secure the recorder on the off chance that you unintentionally drop it, yet it helps you keep a superior hold on the gadget.  

Conversely, the outside of TASCAM DR-40 is simply raw, common plastic. Indeed, before you put the batteries within it, it feels like an empty plastic box. Keep in mind, it is remarkably more affordable, and fittingly, this includes some major disadvantages. 

If you attempt to pass judgment on the spans of these two recorders by looking at photographs on the Internet, TASCAM DR-40 at times seems smaller. But, actually, the two models are almost a similar size and shape.

They are too cumbersome to even consider slipping into a pocket, except if you are wearing load shorts which is not an issue.  

Despite the fact that these recorders look strikingly comparable, the manner in which you work them is quite unique. Most of the directions on the H4n are completed with a side-mounted push-button.

These are not a typical arrangement of controls, and in a like manner, it feels strange working them. The other drawback is that the push-button wheel has a modest vibe.  

A perspective that numerous individuals find befuddling about Zoom H4n is that it works in three separate modes: 2CH, 4CH, and MTR. 2CH represents two channels, implying that it is a two-track stereo mode.

You are either recording with the two implicit mics or the mic inputs. 4CH represents four channels. This mode is for individuals who need to record four tracks one after another, utilizing both the implicit mics and external inputs.  

MTR mode represents multi-track mode. This mode is for performers who need to regard the H4n as a compact chronicle studio. In MTR mode, you can set out a track, and after that overdub another track over it.

This mode does not generally have a reason for individuals who utilize the H4n as a sound recorder for video preparations.  

The greater part of the controls on TASCAM DR-40 is done on the essence of the gadget, and the greater part of the buttons are named, which makes it marginally progressively natural.

Be that as it may, control is killed and on by squeezing and holding the Stop button. The Stop button has the third capacity as going about as the Home button. The sliding Power/Hold switch on Zoom H4n is a lot more pleasant.  

Similitudes the two models share:  

  • Double XLR inputs  
  • Worked in stereo condenser mics  
  • Capacity to record four tracks at the same time, utilizing XLR inputs and inherent mics  
  • Can supply apparition control  
  • Both can record 24-piece 96kHz  
  • Record to removable SD cards  
  • Almost indistinguishable size and weight  

What makes them extraordinary:  

  • XLR contributions on TASCAM DR-40 can be changed to acknowledge line-level sign  
  • The Zoom H4n has a stereo 1/8 contribution for mics  
  • TASCAM DR-40 highlights locking XLR inputs  
  • TASCAM DR-40 takes three AA batteries while Zoom H4n just takes two  
  • An AC connector is incorporated with Zoom H4n while only batteries accompany TASCAM DR-40  
  • Zoom H4n can go about as a PC sound interface 
  • Zoom H4n accompanies a valuable perfectly sized plastic case 

Sound Quality  

The two digital recorders sound good. From the outset, the sound of Zoom H4n might seem better than the other. However, the more you tune in, the less you can differentiate.

Neither one of the recorders is extraordinary. They are practically equivalent in sonic execution which is generally the situation with these reasonable versatile recorders.  

If you have no plans to claim both of these recorders, we would most likely recommend you TASCAM DR-40 since it is significantly less expensive and it does essentially a similar thing as Zoom H4n.

Nonetheless, on the off chance that you do not possess some other sound apparatus and have no plans to ever purchase a field blender, get Zoom H4n instead. TASCAM DR-40 is not superior to Zoom H4n.

The triumphant element would be the fact that it has a physical change to utilize the XLR contributions to record a line-level sign. 

Zoom H4N vs Tacam DR-40

- Japanese Version
- Japanese Manual Only
- No US Warranty
- Discontinued Model Replaced by New & Improved DR-40X
- Switchable microphone position from X-Y to a-b. Os - Windows XP, Windows Vista, Windows 7, Windows 8
- 4-Track recording - Record the built-in microphones and mic inputs at the same time


Having the option to record a line-level sign is a significant component for any individual who uses a field blender. You can use Sound Devices 302 when you record.

At the point when you utilize a decent quality field blender as the front end, you only need to utilize the recorder as a “piece can” which implies that you are not utilizing its preamps for mics. You are simply connecting a line-level sign and recording a high-goals sound document with the gadget.  

Some of you have most likely read this far into the article planning to find out about the preamp execution between these two units. One thing that we can assure you is the fact that they are both shoddy. 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *